Definition df-sb 1170

Description: Define proper substitution. Remark 9.1 in [Megill] p. 447 (p. 15 of the preprint). For our notation, we use [y / x]ph to mean "the wff that results when y is properly substituted for x in the wff ph." We can also use [y / x]ph in place of the "free for" side condition used in traditional predicate calculus; see, for example, stdpc4 1183.

Our notation was introduced in Haskell B. Curry's Foundations of Mathematical Logic (1977), p. 316 and is frequently used in textbooks of lambda calculus and combinatory logic. This notation improves the common but ambiguous notation, "ph(y) is the wff that results when y is properly substituted for x in ph(x)." For example, if the original ph(x) is x = y, then ph(y) is y = y, from which we obtain that ph(x) is x = x. So what exactly does ph(x) mean? Curry's notation solves this problem.

In most books, proper substitution has a somewhat complicated recursive definition with multiple cases based on the occurrences of free and bound variables in the wff. Instead, we use a remarkable little formula that is exactly equivalent and gives us a single direct definition. We later prove that our definition has the properties we expect of proper substitution (see theorems sbequ 1227, sbcom2 1332 and sbid2v 1341).

Note that our definition is valid even when x and y are replaced with the same variable, as sbid 1182 shows. We achieve this by having x free in the first conjunct and bound in the second. We can also achieve this by using a dummy variable, as the alternate definition dfsb7 1338 shows (which some logicians may prefer because it doesn't mix free and bound variables). Another version that mixes free and bound variables is dfsb3 1224. When x and y are distinct, we can express proper substitution with the simpler expressions of sb5 1266 and sb6 1265.

There are no restrictions on any of the variables, including what variables may occur in wff ph.

Assertion

Ref	Expression
df-sb	|- ([y / x]ph <-> ((x = y -> ph) /\ E.x(x = y /\ ph)))

Detailed syntax breakdown of Definition df-sb

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wph	. . 3 wff ph
2		vx	. . 3 set x
3		vy	. . . 4 set y
4	3	cv 953	. . 3 class y
5	1, 2, 4	wsbc 1168	. 2 wff [y / x]ph
6	2	cv 953	. . . . 5 class x
7	6, 4	wceq 954	. . . 4 wff x = y
8	7, 1	wi 3	. . 3 wff (x = y -> ph)
9	7, 1	wa 223	. . . 4 wff (x = y /\ ph)
10	9, 2	wex 978	. . 3 wff E.x(x = y /\ ph)
11	8, 10	wa 223	. 2 wff ((x = y -> ph) /\ E.x(x = y /\ ph))
12	5, 11	wb 146	1 wff ([y / x]ph <-> ((x = y -> ph) /\ E.x(x = y /\ ph)))

This definition is referenced by:  sbimi 1171  drsb1 1173  sb1 1174  sb2 1175  sbequ1 1176  sbequ2 1177  sbn 1229  sb6 1265

Copyright terms: Public domain