HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Browser slow? Try the
Unicode version.

Jump to page: Contents + 1 1-100 2 101-200 3 201-300 4 301-400 5 401-500 6 501-600 7 601-700 8 701-800 9 801-900 10 901-1000 11 1001-1100 12 1101-1200 13 1201-1300 14 1301-1400 15 1401-1500 16 1501-1600 17 1601-1700 18 1701-1800 19 1801-1900 20 1901-2000 21 2001-2100 22 2101-2200 23 2201-2300 24 2301-2400 25 2401-2500 26 2501-2600 27 2601-2700 28 2701-2800 29 2801-2900 30 2901-3000 31 3001-3100 32 3101-3200 33 3201-3300 34 3301-3400 35 3401-3500 36 3501-3600 37 3601-3700 38 3701-3800 39 3801-3900 40 3901-4000 41 4001-4100 42 4101-4200 43 4201-4300 44 4301-4400 45 4401-4500 46 4501-4600 47 4601-4700 48 4701-4800 49 4801-4900 50 4901-5000 51 5001-5100 52 5101-5200 53 5201-5300 54 5301-5400 55 5401-5500 56 5501-5600 57 5601-5700 58 5701-5800 59 5801-5900 60 5901-6000 61 6001-6100 62 6101-6200 63 6201-6300 64 6301-6400 65 6401-6500 66 6501-6600 67 6601-6700 68 6701-6800 69 6801-6900 70 6901-7000 71 7001-7100 72 7101-7200 73 7201-7300 74 7301-7400 75 7401-7500 76 7501-7600 77 7601-7700 78 7701-7800 79 7801-7900 80 7901-8000 81 8001-8100 82 8101-8200 83 8201-8300 84 8301-8400 85 8401-8500 86 8501-8600 87 8601-8700 88 8701-8800 89 8801-8900 90 8901-9000 91 9001-9100 92 9101-9200 93 9201-9300 94 9301-9400 95 9401-9500 96 9501-9600 97 9601-9700 98 9701-9800 99 9801-9900 100 9901-10000 101 10001-10100 102 10101-10200 103 10201-10300 104 10301-10400 105 10401-10500 106 10501-10600 107 10601-10700 108 10701-10783

Color key:    Metamath Proof Explorer  Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-8789)
  Hilbert Space Explorer  Hilbert Space Explorer
(8790-10370)
  User Sandboxes  User Sandboxes
(10371-10783)
 

Statement List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 7501-7600 - Page 76 of 108
TypeLabelDescription
Statement
 
Theoremxpnnen 7501 The cross product of the set of natural numbers with itself is equinumerous to the set of natural numbers. The key idea is to use nn0opth2t 6670 to show that the mapping from natural numbers z and w to ((z + w)^2) + w is one-to-one.
|- (NN X. NN) ~~ NN
 
Theoremxpomen 7502 The cross product of omega (the set of ordinal natural numbers) with itself is equinumerous to omega. Exercise 1 of [Enderton] p. 133 (which proves this with a direct, but longer, proof; ours uses instead the Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem sbth 4457 in xpnnen 7501).
|- (om X. om) ~~ om
 
Theoremznnenlem 7503 Lemma for znnen 7504.
 
Theoremznnen 7504 The set of integers and the set of natural numbers are equinumerous. Exercise 1 of [Gleason] p. 140.
|- ZZ ~~ NN
 
Theoremqnnen 7505 The rational numbers are countable. (This unusual proof uses the Axiom of Choice via fodom 4798 to make it much shorter, but this theorem can also be proved without it. See, for example, Exercise 2 of [Enderton] p. 133.)
|- QQ ~~ NN
 
Infinite primes theorem
 
Theoremunbenlem 7506 Lemma for unben 7507.
 
Theoremunben 7507 An unbounded set of natural numbers is infinite.
|- ((A (_ NN /\ A.m e. NN E.n e. A m < n) -> A ~~ NN)
 
Theoreminfpnlem1 7508 Lemma for infpn 7510. The smallest divisor (greater than 1) M of N! + 1 is a prime greater than N.
 
Theoreminfpnlem2 7509 Lemma for infpn 7510. For any natural number N, there exists a prime number j greater than N.
 
Theoreminfpn 7510 There exist infinitely many prime numbers: for any natural number N, there exists a prime number j greater than N. (See infpn2 7511 for the equinumerosity version.)
|- (N e. NN -> E.j e. NN (N < j /\ A.k e. NN ((j / k) e. NN -> (k = 1 \/ k = j))))
 
Theoreminfpn2 7511 There exist infinitely many prime numbers: the set of all primes S is unbounded by infpn 7510, so by unben 7507 it is infinite.
|- S = {n e. NN | (1 < n /\ A.m e. NN ((n / m) e. NN -> (m = 1 \/ m = n)))}   =>   |- S ~~ NN
 
The reals are uncountable
 
Theoremruclem1 7512 Lemma for ruc 7551 (the reals are uncountable). This is an arithmetic fact that will be used to compute ordering relations.
 
Theoremruclem2 7513 Lemma for ruc 7551. Arithmetic fact that will be used to compute ordering relations.
 
Theoremruclem3 7514 Lemma for ruc 7551. Arithmetic fact that will be used to compute ordering relations.
 
Theoremruclem4 7515 Lemma for ruc 7551. Helper lemma showing a tedious equality used several times.
 
Theoremruclem5 7516 Lemma for ruc 7551. Helper lemma showing the input function used for our recursive sequence builder (defined in ruclem13 7524) is a set.
 
Theoremruclem6 7517 Lemma for ruc 7551. Helper lemma showing the input function used for our recursive sequence builder (defined in ruclem13 7524) matches our input mapping F for successor values.
 
Theoremruclem7 7518 Lemma for ruc 7551. Helper lemma showing the initial value of the input function for our recursive sequence builder (defined in ruclem13 7524).
 
Theoremruclem8 7519 Lemma for ruc 7551. Helper lemma showing the successor value of the input function for our recursive sequence builder (defined in ruclem13 7524).
 
Theoremruclem9 7520 Lemma for ruc 7551. Helper lemma showing the operation used for our recursive sequence builder (defined in ruclem13 7524) is a set.
 
Theoremruclem10 7521 Lemma for ruc 7551. The values of our recursive sequence builder are pairs of real numbers. The values of our constructed function G are the first of these pairs.
 
Theoremruclem11 7522 Lemma for ruc 7551. The values of our recursive sequence builder are pairs of real numbers. The values of our constructed function H are the second of these pairs.
 
Theoremruclem12 7523 Lemma for ruc 7551. A helper lemma that changes bound variables.
 
Theoremruclem13 7524 Lemma for ruc 7551. A helper lemma showing the recursive sequence builder used for our construction maps natural numbers to pairs of reals.
 
Theoremruclem14 7525 Lemma for ruc 7551. A helper lemma showing the initial value of the recursive sequence builder used for our construction.
 
Theoremruclem15 7526 Lemma for ruc 7551. A helper lemma showing the successor value of the recursive sequence builder used for our construction.
 
Theoremruclem16 7527 Lemma for ruc 7551. A helper lemma showing the initial value of our constructed G.
 
Theoremruclem17 7528 Lemma for ruc 7551. A helper lemma showing our constructed function G maps NN to real numbers.
 
Theoremruclem18 7529 Lemma for ruc 7551. The value of our constructed function G when the value of the input function F lies between the previous values of G and H. This assignment to G defines a new interval between G and H (see also ruclem19 7530) that avoids the value of F.
 
Theoremruclem19 7530 Lemma for ruc 7551. The value of our constructed function H when the value of the input function F lies between the previous values of G and H. This assignment to H defines a new interval between G and H (see also ruclem18 7529) that avoids the value of F.
 
Theoremruclem20 7531 Lemma for ruc 7551. The value of our constructed function G when the value of the input function F does not lie between the previous values of G and H. This assignment to G just shrinks the interval between G and H by some arbitrary amount.
 
Theoremruclem21 7532 Lemma for ruc 7551. The value of our constructed function H when the value of the input function F does not lie between the previous values of G and H. This assignment to H just shrinks the interval between G and H by some arbitrary amount.
 
Theoremruclem22 7533 Lemma for ruc 7551. Each value of our constructed function G is a real number.
 
Theoremruclem23 7534 Lemma for ruc 7551. Each value of our constructed function H is a real number.
 
Theoremruclem24 7535 Lemma for ruc 7551. A helper lemma for the induction hypothesis in ruclem25 7536.
 
Theoremruclem25 7536 Lemma for ruc 7551. At any index A, the value of G is less than the value of H.
 
Theoremruclem26 7537 Lemma for ruc 7551. Our constructed function G has an ever-increasing set of values.
 
Theoremruclem27 7538 Lemma for ruc 7551. Our constructed function H has an ever-decreasing set of values.
 
Theoremruclem28 7539 Lemma for ruc 7551. A helper lemma for ruclem29 7540.
 
Theoremruclem29 7540 Lemma for ruc 7551. At any index A, the interval between our constructed functions G and H does not include the corresponding value of input function F. In other words, our constructed functions define, by ruclem26 7537 and ruclem27 7538, an ever-shrinking interval that eventually squeezes out all values of F.
 
Theoremruclem30 7541 Lemma for ruc 7551. A helper lemma for ruclem32 7543.
 
Theoremruclem31 7542 Lemma for ruc 7551. A helper lemma for ruclem32 7543.
 
Theoremruclem32 7543 Lemma for ruc 7551. All values of function G are less than all values of function H.
 
Theoremruclem33 7544 Lemma for ruc 7551. The set of values of our constructed function G is a non-empty subset of RR. This is a helper lemma for theorems involving supremum.
 
Theoremruclem34 7545 Lemma for ruc 7551. The supremum of the set of values of our constructed function G is a real number.
 
Theoremruclem35 7546 Lemma for ruc 7551. The supremum we have constructed lies between all values of the G and H functions. Compare ruclem29 7540, which states the opposite for the input function F.
 
Theoremruclem36 7547 Lemma for ruc 7551. No value of F is equal to the supremum we have constructed.
 
Theoremruclem37 7548 Lemma for ruc 7551. If F is any function that maps NN into RR, then F cannot be onto RR.
 
Theoremruclem38 7549 Lemma for ruc 7551. If F is any function that maps NN into RR, then F cannot be onto RR. Using eqid 1475, this lemma eliminates those hypotheses of ruclem37 7548 that are no longer needed.
 
Theoremruclem39 7550 Lemma for ruc 7551. There is no function that maps NN onto RR. (Use nex 1101 if you want this in the form -. E.ff:NN-onto->RR.)
 
Theoremruc 7551 The set of natural numbers is strictly dominated by the set of real numbers, i.e. the real numbers are uncountable. The proof consists of lemmas ruclem1 7512 through ruclem39 7550 and this final piece. Our proof is based on the proof of Theorem 5.18 of [Truss] p. 114. See ruclem39 7550 for the function existence version of this theorem. For an informal discussion of this proof, see http://us.metamath.org/mpegif/mmcomplex.html#uncountable.
|- NN ~< RR
 
Theoremresdomq 7552 The set of rationals is strictly less equinumerous than the set of reals (RR strictly dominates QQ).
|- QQ ~< RR
 
Theoremaleph1re 7553 There are at least aleph-one real numbers.
|- (aleph` 1o) ~<_ RR
 
Cardinal arithmetic (cont.)
 
Theoreminfxpidmlem1 7554 Lemma for infxpidm 7566. An infinite idempotent set x is equinumerous to the union of any two sets A and B equinumerous to it.
 
Theoreminfxpidmlem2 7555 Lemma for infxpidm 7566. A necessary and sufficient condition for a set B to belong to H.
 
Theoreminfxpidmlem3 7556 Lemma for infxpidm 7566. A sufficient condition for a set B to belong to H.
 
Theoreminfxpidmlem4 7557 Lemma for infxpidm 7566. The domain of a member of H is the cross product of its range.
 
Theoreminfxpidmlem5 7558 Lemma for infxpidm 7566. Two members in the range of a member of a subset of H form an ordered pair belonging to the domain of the union of the subset.
 
Theoreminfxpidmlem6 7559 Lemma for infxpidm 7566. A simple but frequently used fact.
 
Theoreminfxpidmlem7 7560 Lemma for infxpidm 7566. The union of a collection C of chains in H is a bijection.
 
Theoreminfxpidmlem8 7561 Lemma for infxpidm 7566. The union of a collection of chains C in the collection of bijections H belongs to H. This property will be needed to apply Zorn's Lemma in infxpidmlem9 7562.
 
Theoreminfxpidmlem9 7562 Lemma for infxpidm 7566. By Zorn's Lemma zorn 4797, the collection H (which we show here to be a set) has a maximal element.
 
Theoreminfxpidmlem10 7563 Lemma for infxpidm 7566. A maximal bijection g in H is non-empty.
 
Theoreminfxpidmlem11 7564 Lemma for infxpidm 7566. We show that the union of a bijection g in H with a disjoint bijection u is a member h of H that is larger than (properly extends) g. Thus if the antecedent is true then g cannot be maximal.
 
Theoreminfxpidmlem12 7565 Lemma for infxpidm 7566. Letting x be the range of a maximal bijection g in H, infxpidmlem11 7564 lets us show that assuming x ~<_ (A \ x) leads to the contradiction E.h e. Hg (. h meaning g is not maximal. Thus (A \ x) ~< x. This allows us to show that x is as big as A. Since x is idempotent, and g exists by Zorn's Lemma in infxpidmlem9 7562, A is also idempotent.
 
Theoreminfxpidm 7566 The cross product of an infinite set with itself is idempotent. This theorem provides the basis for infinite cardinal arithmetic. Lemma 6R of [Enderton] p. 162, whose proof we follow closely. The main proof consists of infxpidmlem1 7554 through infxpidmlem12 7565. This final piece eliminates the first hypothesis of infxpidmlem12 7565.
|- A e. V   =>   |- (om ~<_ A -> (A X. A) ~~ A)
 
Theoreminfunabs 7567 An infinite set is equinumerous to its union with a smaller one.
|- A e. V   &   |- B e. V   =>   |- ((om ~<_ A /\ B ~<_ A) -> (A u. B) ~~ A)
 
Theoreminfcdaabs 7568 Absorption law for addition to an infinite cardinal.
|- A e. V   &   |- B e. V   =>   |- ((om ~<_ A /\ B ~<_ A) -> (A +c B) ~~ A)
 
Theoreminfcda 7569 The sum of two cardinal numbers is their maximum, if one of them is infinite. Proposition 10.41 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 95.
|- A e. V   &   |- B e. V   =>   |- (om ~<_ A -> (A +c B) ~~ (A u. B))
 
Theoreminfdif 7570 The cardinality of an infinite set does not change after subtracting a strictly smaller one. Example in [Enderton] p. 164.
|- A e. V   &   |- B e. V   =>   |- ((om ~<_ A /\ B ~< A) -> (A \ B) ~~ A)
 
Theoreminfdif2 7571 Cardinality ordering for an infinite set difference.
|- A e. V   &   |- B e. V   =>   |- (om ~<_ A -> ((A \ B) ~<_ B <-> A ~<_ B))
 
Theoreminfxpabs 7572 Absorption law for multiplication with an infinite cardinal.
|- A e. V   &   |- B e. V   =>   |- ((om ~<_ A /\ B =/= (/) /\ B ~<_ A) -> (A X. B) ~~ A)
 
Theoreminfxpdom 7573 Dominance law for multiplication with an infinite cardinal.
|- A e. V   &   |- B e. V   =>   |- ((om ~<_ A /\ B ~<_ A) -> (A X. B) ~<_ A)
 
Theoreminfxp 7574 Absorption law for multiplication with an infinite cardinal. Equivalent to Proposition 10.41 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 95.
|- A e. V   &   |- B e. V   =>   |- ((om ~<_ A /\ B =/= (/)) -> (A X. B) ~~ (A u. B))
 
Theoreminfmap1 7575 An exponentiation law for infinite cardinals. Exercise 34 of [Enderton] p. 165.
|- A e. V   &   |- B e. V   =>   |- (((2o ~<_ A /\ om ~<_ B) /\ A ~<_ B) -> (A ^m B) ~~ (2o ^m B))
 
Theoreminfpss 7576 Every infinite set has an equinumerous proper subset. Exercise 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91.
|- A e. V   =>   |- (om ~<_ A -> E.x(x (. A /\ x ~~ A))
 
Theoremiunctb 7577 The countable union of countable sets is countable (indexed union version of unictb 7578).
|- A e. V   &   |- B e. V   =>   |- ((A ~<_ om /\ A.x e. A B ~<_ om) -> U_x e. A B ~<_ om)
 
Theoremunictb 7578 The countable union of countable sets is countable. Theorem 6Q of [Enderton] p. 159. See iunctb 7577 for indexed union version.
|- A e. V   =>   |- ((A ~<_ om /\ A.x e. A x ~<_ om) -> U.A ~<_ om)
 
Theoremunctb 7579 The union of two countable sets is countable. (Contributed by FL, 25-Aug-2006.)
|- ((A ~<_ om /\ B ~<_ om) -> (A u. B) ~<_ om)
 
Theoremaleph1irr 7580 There are at least aleph-one irrationals.
|- (aleph` 1o) ~<_ (RR \ QQ)
 
Theoreminfmap2lem1 7581 Lemma for infmap2 7583. Technical result that is used several times.
 
Theoreminfmap2lem2 7582 Lemma for infmap2 7583. Given the relation R, we use the Axiom of Choice ac7g 4749 to extract a function f that provides the one-to-one mapping for the dominance relation.
 
Theoreminfmap2 7583 An exponentiation law for infinite cardinals. Similar to Lemma 6.2 of [Jech] p. 43. We start with infmap2lem2 7582 and also prove the other direction of the dominance relation. We obtain equinumerosity with Schroeder-Bernstein sbth 4457 and finally eliminate the degenerate case B = (/).
|- A e. V   &   |- B e. V   =>   |- ((om ~<_ A /\ B ~<_ A) -> (A ^m B) ~~ {x | (x (_ A /\ x ~~ B)})
 
Theoremalephadd 7584 The sum of two alephs is their maximum. Equation 6.1 of [Jech] p. 42.
|- ((aleph` A) +c (aleph` B)) ~~ ((aleph` A) u. (aleph` B))
 
Theoremalephmul 7585 The product of two alephs is their maximum. Equation 6.1 of [Jech] p. 42.
|- ((A e. On /\ B e. On) -> ((aleph` A) X. (aleph` B)) ~~ ((aleph` A) u. (aleph` B)))
 
Theoremalephexp1 7586 An exponentiation law for alephs. Lemma 6.1 of [Jech] p. 42.
|- (((A e. On /\ B e. On) /\ A (_ B) -> ((aleph` A) ^m (aleph` B)) ~~ (2o ^m (aleph` B)))
 
Theoremalephsuc3 7587 An alternate representation of a successor aleph. Compare alephsuc 4866 and alephsuc2 4881. Equality can be obtained by taking the card of the right-hand side then using alephcard 4867 and carden 4831.
|- (A e. On -> (aleph` suc A) ~~ {x e. On | x ~~ (aleph` A)})
 
Theoremalephexp2 7588 An expression equinumerous to 2 to an aleph power. The proof equates the two laws for cardinal exponentiation alephexp1 7586 (which works if the base is less than or equal to the exponent) and infmap2 7583 (which works if the exponent is less than or equal to the base). They can be equated only when the base is equal to the exponent, and this is the result.
|- (A e. On -> (2o ^m (aleph` A)) ~~ {x | (x (_ (aleph` A) /\ x ~~ (aleph` A))})
 
Continuum Hypothesis
 
Theoremgch-kn 7589 The equivalence of two versions of the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis. The right-hand side is the standard version in the literature. The left-hand side is a version devised by Kannan Nambiar, which he calls the Axiom of Combinatorial Sets. For the notation and motivation behind this axiom, see his paper, "Derivation of Continuum Hypothesis from Axiom of Combinatorial Sets," available at http://www.e-atheneum.net/science/derivation_ch.pdf. The equivalence of the two sides provides a negative answer to Open Problem 2 in http://www.e-atheneum.net/science/open_problem_print.pdf. The key idea in the proof below is to equate both sides of alephexp2 7588 to the successor aleph using enen2 4478.
|- (A e. On -> ((aleph` suc A) ~~ {x | (x (_ (aleph` A) /\ x ~~ (aleph` A))} <-> (aleph` suc A) ~~ (2o ^m (aleph` A))))
 
Topology
 
Topological spaces
 
Syntaxctop 7590 Extend class notation with the class of all topologies.
class Top
 
Syntaxctps 7591 Extend class notation with the class of all topological spaces.
class TopSp
 
Syntaxctb 7592 Extend class notation with the class of all topological bases.
class Bases
 
Syntaxctg 7593 Extend class notation with a function that converts a basis to its corresponding topology.
class topGen
 
Definitiondf-top 7594 Define the (proper) class of all topologies. See istop2g (future) for an alternate way to express finite intersection and istps5 (future) for a standard definition in terms of both members of a topological space.
|- Top = {x | (A.y(y (_ x -> U.y e. x) /\ A.y e. x A.z e. x (y i^i z) e. x)}
 
Definitiondf-topsp 7595 Define the class of all topological spaces, each of which is an ordered pair the second of which is a topology on the first. See istps5 (future) for a standard way to express a topological space.
|- TopSp = {<.x, y>. | (y e. Top /\ x = U.y)}
 
Definitiondf-bases 7596 Define the class of all topological bases. Equivalent to definition of basis in [Munkres] p. 78 (see isbasis2g 7614</