| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Proof by contradiction. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| condan.1 | ⊢ ((φ ⋀ ¬ ψ) → χ) |
| condan.2 | ⊢ ((φ ⋀ ¬ ψ) → ¬ χ) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| condan | ⊢ (φ → ψ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | condan.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((φ ⋀ ¬ ψ) → χ) | |
| 2 | 1 | ex 371 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ → (¬ ψ → χ)) |
| 3 | condan.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((φ ⋀ ¬ ψ) → ¬ χ) | |
| 4 | 3 | ex 371 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ → (¬ ψ → ¬ χ)) |
| 5 | 2, 4 | pm2.65d 134 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → ¬ ¬ ψ) |
| 6 | notnot2 84 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ ¬ ψ → ψ) | |
| 7 | 5, 6 | syl 10 | 1 ⊢ (φ → ψ) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 2 → wi 3 ⋀ wa 221 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 145 df-an 223 |