| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Define proper
substitution. Remark 9.1 in [Megill] p. 447
(p. 15 of the
preprint). For our notation, we use [y / x]φ to mean "the wff
that results when y is properly
substituted for x in the wff
φ." We can also use
[y / x]φ in place
of the "free for"
side condition used in traditional predicate calculus; see, for example,
stdpc4 1185.
Our notation was introduced in Haskell B. Curry's Foundations of Mathematical Logic (1977), p. 316 and is frequently used in textbooks of lambda calculus and combinatory logic. This notation improves the common but ambiguous notation, "φ(y) is the wff that results when y is properly substituted for x in φ(x)." For example, if the original φ(x) is x = y, then φ(y) is y = y, from which we obtain that φ(x) is x = x. So what exactly does φ(x) mean? Curry's notation solves this problem. In most books, proper substitution has a somewhat complicated recursive definition with multiple cases based on the occurrences of free and bound variables in the wff. Instead, we use a remarkable little formula that is exactly equivalent and gives us a single direct definition. We later prove that our definition has the properties we expect of proper substitution (see theorems sbequ 1229, sbcom2 1334 and sbid2v 1343). Note that our definition is valid even when x and y are replaced with the same variable, as sbid 1184 shows. We achieve this by having x free in the first conjunct and bound in the second. We can also achieve this by using a dummy variable, as the alternate definition dfsb7 1340 shows (which some logicians may prefer because it doesn't mix free and bound variables). Another version that mixes free and bound variables is dfsb3 1226. When x and y are distinct, we can express proper substitution with the simpler expressions of sb5 1268 and sb6 1267. There are no restrictions on any of the variables, including what variables may occur in wff φ. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| df-sb | ⊢ ([y / x]φ ↔ ((x = y → φ) ⋀ ∃x(x = y ⋀ φ))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | wph | . . 3 wff φ | |
| 2 | vx | . . 3 set x | |
| 3 | vy | . . . 4 set y | |
| 4 | 3 | cv 955 | . . 3 class y |
| 5 | 1, 2, 4 | wsbc 1170 | . 2 wff [y / x]φ |
| 6 | 2 | cv 955 | . . . . 5 class x |
| 7 | 6, 4 | wceq 956 | . . . 4 wff x = y |
| 8 | 7, 1 | wi 3 | . . 3 wff (x = y → φ) |
| 9 | 7, 1 | wa 223 | . . . 4 wff (x = y ⋀ φ) |
| 10 | 9, 2 | wex 980 | . . 3 wff ∃x(x = y ⋀ φ) |
| 11 | 8, 10 | wa 223 | . 2 wff ((x = y → φ) ⋀ ∃x(x = y ⋀ φ)) |
| 12 | 5, 11 | wb 146 | 1 wff ([y / x]φ ↔ ((x = y → φ) ⋀ ∃x(x = y ⋀ φ))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| This definition is referenced by: sbimi 1173 drsb1 1175 sb1 1176 sb2 1177 sbequ1 1178 sbequ2 1179 sbn 1231 sb6 1267 |