| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Restricted existential specialization with implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2007.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rcla4dv.1 | ⊢ ((φ ⋀ x = A) → (ψ ↔ χ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rcla4edv | ⊢ ((φ ⋀ A ∈ B) → (χ → ∃x ∈ B ψ)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | rcla4dv.1 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((φ ⋀ x = A) → (ψ ↔ χ)) | |
| 2 | 1 | expcom 374 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (x = A → (φ → (ψ ↔ χ))) |
| 3 | 2 | pm5.74d 585 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (x = A → ((φ → ψ) ↔ (φ → χ))) |
| 4 | 3 | rcla4ev 1877 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((A ∈ B ⋀ (φ → χ)) → ∃x ∈ B (φ → ψ)) |
| 5 | r19.37av 1761 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (∃x ∈ B (φ → ψ) → (φ → ∃x ∈ B ψ)) | |
| 6 | 4, 5 | syl 10 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((A ∈ B ⋀ (φ → χ)) → (φ → ∃x ∈ B ψ)) |
| 7 | 6 | ex 373 | . . 3 ⊢ (A ∈ B → ((φ → χ) → (φ → ∃x ∈ B ψ))) |
| 8 | 7 | pm2.86d 71 | . 2 ⊢ (A ∈ B → (φ → (χ → ∃x ∈ B ψ))) |
| 9 | 8 | impcom 351 | 1 ⊢ ((φ ⋀ A ∈ B) → (χ → ∃x ∈ B ψ)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 3 ↔ wb 146 ⋀ wa 223 = wceq 956 ∈ wcel 958 ∃wrex 1646 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 ax-7 962 ax-gen 963 ax-8 964 ax-12 968 ax-17 971 ax-4 973 ax-5o 975 ax-6o 978 ax-9o 1123 ax-ext 1459 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-or 224 df-an 225 df-ex 981 df-sb 1172 df-clab 1464 df-cleq 1469 df-clel 1472 df-ral 1649 df-rex 1650 df-v 1812 |