| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: A syllogism rule of inference. The second premise is used to replace the consequent of the first premise. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| syl8.1 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → θ))) |
| syl8.2 | ⊢ (θ → τ) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| syl8 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → τ))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | syl8.1 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → θ))) | |
| 2 | syl8.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (θ → τ) | |
| 3 | 2 | imim2i 17 | . 2 ⊢ ((χ → θ) → (χ → τ)) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | syl6 22 | 1 ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → τ))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 3 |
| This theorem is referenced by: syl8ib 215 a12studyALT 1418 onfr 3014 suctr 3055 ssorduni 3147 tfindsg 3213 findsg 3245 tz7.49 4260 nneneq 4659 aceq6b 4888 ltbtwnpq 5238 reclem3pr 5312 suppsr2 5377 qreccl 6412 iserzgt0 7415 nmoubi 8689 nmopub 10112 nmfnleub 10129 sumdmdlem2 10628 prj1 10809 bwt2 11123 altretop 11144 com45 11325 a1i4 11334 ordiso 11426 compsub 11488 isufil2 11650 txcn 11979 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-mp 7 |